Recent Comments

Now Reading

Planned books:

Current books:

  • Siddhartha

    Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse

Recent books:

View full Library

Archive for the 'Society' Category

Stupid White Men

Posted in Society on May 29th, 2008

have you ever read those musician/band interviews and every guy is like “we’re so new, we’re so different, we’re so misunderstood, we’re so judged!”

now i’m not saying that what they’re saying isn’t valid - indeed many of them are “different” or innovative for their industry, etc. yet i sometimes laugh to myself - it’s like ok, if that’s how 4 white guys who play guitar, drums, bass, and do vocals (the standards) feel and everyone’s so astonished that the “industry” would actually let them succeed, what of someone who isn’t some white guy? i mean, try being a muslim woman, how’s that for “different” lol

i was thinking of this because right now we’re putting out the comic book (in the printing process!), but after that i plan to put out a multimedia poetry album - and im glad we’re doing it on our own, cuz let’s put it this way - i’m weird for american culture (not just the obvious “outsider” status of being a “religious muslim” but i am also pretty progressive in terms of artistry, genre, format, etc.) and im weird for muslim culture too (this is more just my personality)- no way it would ever get picked up!

Omnisexual

Posted in Society on May 21st, 2008

The fact of the matter is that the world we are living in is pervasive with sexuality. Now, don’t get fooled into thinking in the past the world wasn’t pervasive with sexuality - it’s just that there seems to be a cycle in “civilized” societies - they start off at a norm and then simply degenerate into open corruption (classic example being the Roman empire). The societies which ironically don’t follow this pattern are the ones we think of as “uncivilized”, “barbaric”, etc. - the ones which are usually isolated from other communities or preserve a single way of life for long periods of time with very little change.

I know that many people do not understand the relationship between religion and sexuality - many feel religion is devoid of it or only calls towards celibacy, but this is not true. Islam in particular deals very practically with it: sexuality is a part of human life and a natural human desire. However, it is also known that as it is a “desire”, it can overtake a person, to the detriment of their spiritual growth (in general materialism or following one’s desire is the opposite of a person’s self-control and training of the soul). So from a religious viewpoint it is something which is not entirely outlawed but limited - and one who seeks God seeks to control his desires (this is true of everything, by the way, not just sexual desire). From a social point of view, unlimited (meaning not bound by any rules) sexuality is also seen as detrimental to the family unit - causing many problems (this is commonly known to include physical diseases, illegitemate births, infidelity, etc.). So again, there are guidelines.

To be honest, one of the things that is often even offensive to people is Islam’s utter frankness in dealing with sexual issues (again this is not considered “normal” for religion, which usually considers discussing such a topic as taboo or sinful even as a subject, etc.). Islam baldly admits human beings’ sexuality as natural and inherent, no different than our desire to eat or gain wealth. And that is exactly why many of our laws regarding it are so strict (to spin it in a better way “practical”). We do not expect in a society where women dress as provocatively as they can and men are constantly bombarded with images of desire and giving into those desires (usually to sell a product lol) that problems such as infidelity, marital dissatisfaction, or simple irresponsibility will not abound. We do not believe in the utopian dream world many often present, that one can eliminate the element of sexuality from the workplace or other places where sexuality is supposed to be inappropriate. In fact, in today’s culture of all out perversion, the very inappropriateness of it may well serve to make it more appealing!

If we look at modern Western society in particular, we see that sexuality is pretty much all over and very in your face. And as anyone knows, sexuality (like most desires) is like a drug. If you get exposed to a little, it will often increase your tolerance for it until you need more to get the same effect. In Victorian times, the glimpse of a woman’s stocking or legs was enough to drive a man mad, but in our times, let’s just say we’re beyond that. It gets to the point that you need more and more, and when you’ve gone the furthest you think you can, there is always something more perverted, forbidden, or inappropriate to explore around the corner. I actually believe given time, child pornography, incest, and other taboos will become prevalent - they are already common as fantasy themes or allusions. I shudder to raise my children in such a world, but then there are so many unpleasant realities of the world we live in.

Now, the Muslims have their own problems in such a setting. A problem I have with Muslims is that many of them are so extreme when it comes to the truth about sex. Many of them have forgotten Islam’s forthrightness on speaking about all issues in life - you may be accused of immodesty or sin for even mentioning the term. Yet this is not how our Prophet peace be upon him was - he would address the questions of the women regarding this topic frankly and maturely. Once one of his wives was so offended at the other’s asking a question that she exclaimed a reprimand. The Prophet then reprimanded her for this and answered the question clearly.

Obviously, some Muslims have made everything under the sun “ok” when it comes to “modern life” such as dating, etc. but this is so laughable I won’t even address it here - it is not from the religion but from their own desires. If you want to join the party, go ahead - but don’t twist Islam to make it look like God gave you the invitation.

I also want to address the issue of homosexuality. It is forbidden in Islam, as it is in orthodox Judaism and Christianity, but my problem is really how religious people often can’t be balanced in their approach to things. For example, some people will simply hear of someone being gay and be morally offended, and yet we are surrounded by plenty of heterosexual activity, which is also forbidden. Yet some of the Muslims themselves engage in some of this stuff (newsflash - Muslims are human too and fall into the same temptations). I don’t see the need for such exaggerated double standards. What’s wrong is wrong, whether it’s heterosexual or homosexual. And in fact, I have a suspicion that in life, human sexuality is one of the most pliable of things - that so much of how we feel about sexuality is colored by culture, that it is possible to be attracted to well, anyone and anything. I mean, some of what passes for “beauty” in one part of the world is “ugliness” in other parts, etc. And in this modern culture particularly, I can see that lesbianism (girls gone wild type thing) is increasingly accepted for ALL segments of society (ahh, the age-old trend of exploiting women, who are the more attractive sex). So I always find the moral outrage of people who have a problem with Islam for allowing polygamy (as many many religions and cultures have throughout history) ridiculous seeing that their own society is so warped on this issue, claiming on the one hand a utopia of sex-free professionalism or simply going for whatever you can possibly imagine, much of it for commercialism (the ultimate turn-on for capitalists lol). If they don’t want to be judged, they sure as hell shouldn’t be judging.

And sadly, a lot of us can’t admit it, but illegal sexual activity is a HUGE problem amongst the Muslims - of course it’s not as bad as with other groups who have thrown out their religion completely, because most Muslims in the end uphold at least the standards of right and wrong that were revealed to us. Yet, let’s face it, the current youth, and my generation as well, comes across so much temptation constantly there that few of us have not fallen into it. Most parents that I know had no idea their daughters were sneaking off to meet guys or whatever. I know that in Jordan for example (and other places) many of the Muslim youth date simply because they have a hard time getting married. (I personally blame the society which puts such high demands on the terms for marriage that they have made it prohibitively out of reach.) A lot of American Muslim youth fall into it too, simply because it’s there. And of course, pornography, especially internet pornography which is soooo very easy to get or even annoyingly unavoidable at times, is worldwide. All it takes is a few seconds for you to be caught off your guard and you might find yourself “in the mood” for trouble. (These intrusions remind me of that joke about sexual harassment - if you like the guy it’s flattering and if you don’t, then it’s harassment! And man, nothing ticks me off more than watching a movie and unexpectedly they throw a scene into your face that you wish you never saw! If I wanted to see porn, that’s what I’d get!)

I guess it’s foolish to say “never go on the internet” or “don’t talk to any guys, ever” because practically speaking that’s not bound to happen. Yet I think if Muslims were more balanced, as they were at the first stage of Islam - of admitting human beings are sexual beings, and look at temptation as a natural thing to be practically dealt with, we are better off. In some backward societies, a girl isn’t even told what her menstrual cycle is for “modesty”! So imagine if that same girl comes into contact with the lewdness of today’s world (which she most likely will). It has been my experience that the unnatural shaming of the very fact of sexuality often backfires, creating repressive people who are all the more curious/perverted when they finally get exposed to it. I feel sad sometimes - there are very few of us who do not have a problem with this issue nowadays, despite everyone trying to make it look like everyone is so pure. I know of only a few “pure” people in this world (and they tend to be that way regardless of religion - simply endowed with a naturally high sense of modesty).

There is hope, though. If you find sex a huge temptation (as most of us who were raised in a very overtly sexual society do) then realize that it is all the more rewarding for you when you struggle against yourself to control it. Obviously you can try to avoid those places and people who seem to pull you in that direction. But mostly, you can remember Allah and ask Him to help you, for as the hadith says, you must hate what is forbidden in your heart, and that “is the weakest of faith”. And again, while it is no sin to be passionate or have natural desires, if you do fall into sin, you must repent and keep struggling with it.

And lastly, I don’t know what it is about sex - most people just can’t discuss it normally. It seems everyone wants to engage in it but yell “aha!” if they see anyone else engaging in it. People often say that for America it’s the Puritanical streak we’ve inherited (pointing out how Europeans are more natural about it). It’s also again one of the things people find objectionable about Islam - you know the whole 72 virgins thing (which by the way is not reserved for martyrs)? People have a hard time thinking God could reward someone with carnal pleasure in Paradise and find the idea distasteful. Why is it any more distasteful than rewarding you with food or wine? It’s all carnal desires. But see, that’s what makes us human - that we have needs and desires. If you control yourself here, you get rewarded there. Nothing distasteful about it. I just think it’s the same weird treatment of sex people in this society particularly have - the whole love/hate/obsession/guilt thing. Let’s put it this way - Islam’s been around for a long time and no one really had a problem with polygamy or other “sexual issues”, but I think the people who can’t get past them have some “sexual issues” of their own.

“No Fear”

Posted in Society on May 5th, 2008

We live in a world where most of us feel, as Queen said, “I want it all and I want it now!” Now, I do believe it’s amazing that we have advanced so much in technology, medicine, etc. but where this progress turns on its head to become regressive is when we believe that if we eliminate all bad feelings, life will be good. I can even see the point in trying to be physically comfortable - if you feel hot, put on the air conditioner; if you have a headache, take a pill; if you’re hungry, grab a snack; heck, if you’re depressed, grab a pill too.

But what I see is that many of us are trying to rid any unpleasant sensation whatsoever, even those which are beneficial to us. For example, I see the slogan “No Fear” a lot (usually on the back of a pickup lol). It is indeed unpleasant to feel afraid - I myself do not enjoy it. Yet the false remedy seems to be to simply hide away (creating a cozy world of television and carefully chosen acquaintances who think as we do) and ignore the things which are frightening: war, corruption, crime, etc. Or we can go the other way and simply nuke everything so that lo and behold we can ignore it as well. Many of the “game faces” you see nowadays, with people being unusually heated or belligerent stems from this. If you go in hard enough, no one can touch you. The problem with this is that it often escalates frightening situations. If everybody’s right, then we’re in serious trouble. Things seem to be getting more and polarized amongst people who are digging in their heels. The frightening situations will not just go away until we can look them in the face and deal with them justly. Yes, it might even reach you one day in your castle-behind-the-walls.

Logic, ethics, and even common sense tell us that it is possible we are wrong sometimes. Yet this is not a thought even entertained by many people nowadays (both non-Muslim and Muslim). Ironically, this is not bravery but cowardice. It is an infant trying to hold onto the security blanket of reassurance, of staying as we are and refusing to be challenged. We may as well put our fingers in our ears and sing la la la. Rather, humility can actually help us find the right answers, no matter how unpleasant the interim of feeling “doubt”. There is legitimate doubt (based on something not being correct or feeling ill at ease in your conscience/soul) and illegitimate doubt (simple neuroticism or lack of confidence, etc.) - and a smart person will keep the good and get rid of the bad. (By the way, many religious people balk at “doubt” as a bad thing - it is when applied to things which are certain or basic, but not to simply keeping an open mind when learning - for how can you be expected to have 100% unwavering certainty in the political dogma you are fed? If you don’t believe me, ask yourself how the person you disagree with is ever supposed to see your side of it - which implies the same applies to you lol.)

This is why the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam said that pride is not looking nice or grooming yourself well, but rather it is “rejecting the Truth and looking down on the people.” There is also a Hadith Qudsi which states that Allah will put anyone who has a speck of pride into the Hellfire.

Another “bad” feeling is that of guilt. Yes, there are some things such as mere social custom which should not make us feel ashamed of ourselves. Yet, shame and guilt are natural inhibitors we have - alarm bells which go off telling us - ahem - that we may not be doing everything right. Now many people, instead of taking heed and correcting their behavior or ridding themselves of the vices or low behaviors, they cleverly go to the root of the “problem” (which is not them of course!) and get rid of the guilt! This is like taking out the batteries in your smoke detector or alarm clock - peace at last - no irritating noise!

The Prophet sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam said that the person who most deserves our shame is Allah. When I was younger, I didn’t quite understand this - I thought it meant literally such as if we are unclothed, etc. and wondered how if Allah created us. The “hayaa`” is not just modesty in a physical way, but it means feeling ashamed. In the olden days they would use public shame to root out the traits considered immoral in the society (which can be quite effective). Yet, if you are doing something wrong, it is a lack of faith to feel afraid from others and safe when in private. And this is the meaning of the statement - for God deserves your self-consciousness of His scrutiny far more than any human being, and the hadith is an injunction towards ridding oneself of hypocrisy while enlightening us of the reality of the matter (God sees all).

Anyway, all I’m saying is that not all of life is meant to be “shiny and happy” (REM). And not all unpleasant feelings in your mind/heart/soul are destructive - many of them are constructive. It will be good to see people who continue to esteem humility, conscience, and righteousness not as simply pointlessly weak states. (The thing is most people instinctively like to feel these things - but simply reject “old fashioned” stuff with “new age” stuff - plenty are “mad as hell” and full of righteous fury, still using the paradigms of good and bad, etc. The basics never really leave us, just get updated.)

Hopefully we see less “brave faces” and more strong essences. “No pain, no gain” doesn’t just apply to weight lifting or learning. It applies to individual human development as well. So if you’re “advanced” hopefully you save some of these “bad feelings” for yourself. :)

Body Objectification (A Summary of a Study)

Posted in Society on March 30th, 2008

Our neighbor asked me to assist him in summarizing a scientific paper from a journal of psychology relating to “Body Objectification”. You might be interested in skimming the summary of the study (lol what a screwed up society we live in, and how much “science” it takes to figure that out!).

Summary

Article: “The Role of Body Objectification in Disordered Eating and Depressed Mood”
Authors: Marika Tiggemann and Julia K. Kuring (School of Psychology, Flinders University of South Australia)
Journal: British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2004, No. 43, pg.s 299 – 311

Study Summary

- Objectives: To test “Objectification Theory” related to psychological depression as well as to study any applications of it to men.
- Design: Cross-sectional study of general population.
- Method: 115 men and 171 women completed questionnaires measuring “self-objectification”, depressed moods, eating disorders, “body shame”, “appearance anxiety”, “flow”, and “awareness of internal states”.
- Results: For women depressed mood and eating disorders could be predicted by “self-objectification” and “self-surveillance”. Men showed
similar relationship patterns to women but did not generally exhibit “self-objectification”.
- Conclusion: “Objectification Theory” is useful in providing tools to predict mood depression and eating disorders.

Purpose of Study

Feminist theory has often claimed that societies which primarily view women as sexual objects result in many psychological and social problems for women in particular and society in general. However, through scientific research we can empirically confirm or disprove these claims. Indeed there is mounting scientific data to confirm that in a society in which women are “objectified”, women tend to become overly critical of their physical appearances, trying to achieve ideals which may not be possible for them to achieve. This leads to constant self-analysis, depression, passivity and/or victimization in relationships, and sexual dysfunction.
This study intends to cover a few specific areas in the study of “Body Objectification” which have not been addressed before, namely its relation to depression, eating disorders, and gender differences.

Study Components

Self-Objectification

Based on the Self-Objectification Questionnaire developed by Noll and Frederickson, the participants were asked to rate which physical qualities were most important to them in terms of their self-image. Five qualities encompassed health (strength, energy, etc.) while five addressed superficial appearance (weight, sex appeal, etc.). The higher a person scored (up to +25) the more emphasis they placed upon physical appearances and this indicated a higher level of “self objectification”.

Self-Surveillance

This portion of the study was assessed through the body surveillance subscale of McKinley and Hyde’s Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Self surveillance refers to the amount of emphasis a person places upon thinking about their appearance in trying to conform to social standards of beauty or perfection. The higher the score, the higher the indication of self-surveillance.

Body Shame

This portion was also taken from McKinley and Hyde, utilizing the subscale of body shame. Body shame refers to how much impact negative social norms have on a person’s likelihood of feeling ashamed of their own body. Again, the higher the score, the more likely the participant felt ashamed of their physical appearance.

Appearance Anxiety

“Appearance Anxiety” refers to the fact that people feel nervous or pressured about the way they look. It was measured using the short form of Dion, Dion, and Keelan’s Appearance Anxiety Scale.

Flow

Flow was measured by the Flow State Scale developed by Jackson and Marsh. It gauges how a person tends to operate. People with higher flow states focus more on their tasks at hand and tend not to be self-conscious, inhibited, or distracted by external factors (most notably being conscious of oneself in relation to others and one’s physical appearance). People with lower flow states are constantly measuring themselves and therefore more involved in the social situation than in the mental tasks before them.

Awareness of Internal Bodily States

This was measured by the “private body consciousness” subscale of the Body Consciousness Scale developed by Miller, Murphy, and Buss. Awareness of internal bodily states indicates how aware a person is of their own body, not on a superficial level, but at the levels of sensation and function.

Disordered Eating

3 behavioral subscales: drive for thinness, bulimia, and body dissatisfaction, were used to measure propensity for eating disorders. This scale was taken from Garner, Olmsted, and Polivy’s EDI (Eating Disorder Inventory). The higher the score, the higher the participant’s susceptibility for eating disorders.

Depressed Mood

Using the BDI (Beck Depression Inventory), the study measured loss of pleasure in activities, psychosomatic disorders, and somatic complaints. The scores represented how the participants felt at the time of the study, higher scores indicating depressed moods.

Table of Findings (optional)

(attach tables here)

Conclusions

In general, women tend to score higher in self-objectification and self-surveillance, as well as the mediators of body shame and appearance anxiety, thus fulfilling the expected outcome of these traits correlating with disordered eating. Flow and depressed mood seemed independent of gender. However, women tended to be better at gauging internal states than men, most likely due to the propensity of women towards general sensitivity.
In studying the correlations between individual traits and resultant pathways of behavior, while women tended to score high on all these traits correlating to depression and disordered eating, men only scored significantly high on body shame and appearance anxiety in relation to the 2 correlated states. One should also note only self-surveillance correlated to disordered eating while self-objectification and self-surveillance did not correlate to depression. Disordered eating and depressed mood were intercorrelated for both men and women, but when partial correlations were tested, it was shown that self-objectification accounted for the variance between disordered eating and depressed mood.
Finally, the data was tested for causality and prediction. It was shown some of the pathways were insignificant and thus could be eliminated as indicating causality or being useful indicators. It was shown that for women, self-objectification leads to self-surveillance, which leads to body shame, appearance anxiety, and decreased flow. Body shame and appearance anxiety could both predict disordered eating and depressed mood. For men, flow tends to predict depressed mood. There is also a significant negative direct pathway between self-objectification and body shame, indicating men tended to give importance to competence-based physical attributes rather than superficial ones. Therefore, men’s marginal focus on muscularity, etc. is not a parallel for the overwhelming sexual objectification that women receive in society. Yet it is proposed that some questionnaires be developed in gender-neutral language so that any differences in perspective can be eliminated. One should note that there is no direct pathway between self-objectification or surveillance to disordered eating and depressed mood, rather, they are mediated states.
Overall, since it is clear that our social norms are causing mental and physical issues for both men and women, it is hoped that even if society cannot immediately remedy the constant obsessions and standards of physical attractiveness, there can be some specific remedies introduced to view the body in more holistic terms than superficial ones alone.


FireStats icon Powered by FireStats